1
00:00:10,009 --> 00:00:07,670
you all could hear me good ok great I'm

2
00:00:13,580 --> 00:00:10,019
not a scientist I'm an attorney I'm

3
00:00:16,099 --> 00:00:13,590
trained in all types of remote viewing

4
00:00:18,260 --> 00:00:16,109
psychic detective work trained trained

5
00:00:20,420 --> 00:00:18,270
mediumship and all that I made a

6
00:00:22,550 --> 00:00:20,430
terrible mistake before I came here I

7
00:00:24,740 --> 00:00:22,560
decided to ask a bunch of scientists

8
00:00:26,029 --> 00:00:24,750
that I was working with on the west

9
00:00:27,050 --> 00:00:26,039
coast what they thought of this

10
00:00:31,070 --> 00:00:27,060
presentation

11
00:00:34,069 --> 00:00:31,080
they had violently opposing points of

12
00:00:35,569 --> 00:00:34,079
view and then they said the only thing

13
00:00:36,650 --> 00:00:35,579
you got to do if you want to talk to

14
00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:36,660
scientists you got to tell him a joke

15
00:00:40,970 --> 00:00:39,090
and I thought I don't know any jokes

16
00:00:42,590 --> 00:00:40,980
and they said well I'll tell one about a

17
00:00:45,049 --> 00:00:42,600
scientist an attorney I did a whole

18
00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:45,059
bunch of research on that and you know

19
00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:46,770
two scientists an attorney walk into a

20
00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:48,930
bar or laboratory or whatever I don't

21
00:00:54,350 --> 00:00:50,850
have time to tell you the joke so now

22
00:00:56,119 --> 00:00:54,360
that you're sufficiently warmed up I'm

23
00:00:59,540 --> 00:00:56,129
gonna keep going because I don't have

24
00:01:02,209 --> 00:00:59,550
much time so I will try to talk about

25
00:01:04,100 --> 00:01:02,219
the concilium a type of remote viewing

26
00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:04,110
that I've been developing over the last

27
00:01:10,190 --> 00:01:08,130
decade called TSP and synchronicities

28
00:01:11,780 --> 00:01:10,200
that is if I still understand the word

29
00:01:15,649 --> 00:01:11,790
and the meaning of the word conciliate

30
00:01:19,640 --> 00:01:15,659
SAP stir the last day or two and why is

31
00:01:21,740 --> 00:01:19,650
that flipping and the word meaning of

32
00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:21,750
synchronicity is that anyway those of

33
00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:23,490
you I'm assuming all of you pretty much

34
00:01:27,679 --> 00:01:25,650
familiar with remote viewing those of

35
00:01:30,020 --> 00:01:27,689
you who are not basically I define it as

36
00:01:33,020 --> 00:01:30,030
clairvoyance with protocols if you're

37
00:01:36,859 --> 00:01:33,030
perceiving something that is distant in

38
00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:36,869
terms of space or time and if you are

39
00:01:41,719 --> 00:01:39,090
not following certain protocols these

40
00:01:43,460 --> 00:01:41,729
are rule steps phases and whatever that

41
00:01:45,889 --> 00:01:43,470
you have to do and you have to insert

42
00:01:48,980 --> 00:01:45,899
your clairvoyance into those rules then

43
00:01:50,569 --> 00:01:48,990
you aren't white I didn't touch it

44
00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:50,579
this has been happening to me a lot

45
00:01:58,959 --> 00:01:53,250
recently actually then you're not doing

46
00:02:02,260 --> 00:01:58,969
remote viewing so I developed ESP

47
00:02:05,510 --> 00:02:02,270
because I was dissatisfied with certain

48
00:02:07,300 --> 00:02:05,520
aspects of remote viewing that had been

49
00:02:10,609 --> 00:02:07,310
developed over the last you know

50
00:02:13,430 --> 00:02:10,619
half-century and I needed something was

51
00:02:15,410 --> 00:02:13,440
better suited to my clients

52
00:02:16,850 --> 00:02:15,420
so and in particular I don't have time

53
00:02:20,090 --> 00:02:16,860
to talk about all the different types of

54
00:02:22,670 --> 00:02:20,100
prototype protocols but basically TSP is

55
00:02:26,300 --> 00:02:22,680
generally but not always a completely

56
00:02:28,820 --> 00:02:26,310
blind target the targets are clients

57
00:02:32,510 --> 00:02:28,830
questions and/or photos that could be

58
00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:32,520
either or neither or both so you can end

59
00:02:38,180 --> 00:02:36,330
up blind sometimes and these are the

60
00:02:41,510 --> 00:02:38,190
protocols that I've put up here on the

61
00:02:44,510 --> 00:02:41,520
screen and you can see basically what

62
00:02:48,470 --> 00:02:44,520
I'm doing is you receive the clients

63
00:02:50,060 --> 00:02:48,480
questions or the photos the viewer then

64
00:02:52,220 --> 00:02:50,070
does what I call an advanced reading

65
00:02:54,260 --> 00:02:52,230
before ever speaking with the client and

66
00:02:56,090 --> 00:02:54,270
it's all fully documented written down

67
00:02:58,040 --> 00:02:56,100
whatever and then the viewer gets in

68
00:02:59,990 --> 00:02:58,050
touch with the client and then has a

69
00:03:01,730 --> 00:03:00,000
feedback session and you get you sort of

70
00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:01,740
put together your your scoring your hits

71
00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:05,010
and your misses what I do in TSP which

72
00:03:08,900 --> 00:03:07,290
I've not seen done in any other type of

73
00:03:11,390 --> 00:03:08,910
remote viewing and I really don't

74
00:03:13,550 --> 00:03:11,400
understand why because to me it seems

75
00:03:17,449 --> 00:03:13,560
obvious is I have added in the element

76
00:03:20,449 --> 00:03:17,459
of synchronicities and I have included

77
00:03:22,910 --> 00:03:20,459
that in my scoring system which I've

78
00:03:27,170 --> 00:03:22,920
developed to be a little bit more

79
00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:27,180
reflective of uncanny data things that

80
00:03:30,980 --> 00:03:29,250
are not just ordinary basic hits or

81
00:03:33,500 --> 00:03:30,990
misses because if you are doing your

82
00:03:37,850 --> 00:03:33,510
normal type of remote viewing if you say

83
00:03:40,820 --> 00:03:37,860
well I see a man wearing a white coat

84
00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:40,830
and he's doing surgery if you get you

85
00:03:47,090 --> 00:03:42,690
know man you break it up in the smallest

86
00:03:49,430 --> 00:03:47,100
possible units man white coat surgery

87
00:03:51,620 --> 00:03:49,440
whatever they you may or may not have

88
00:03:58,430 --> 00:03:51,630
actually been onto the target that's

89
00:04:01,540 --> 00:03:58,440
moving by itself so all right so so I've

90
00:04:04,520 --> 00:04:01,550
added in a more subtly weighted system

91
00:04:06,920 --> 00:04:04,530
going from the ordinary types of hits to

92
00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:06,930
things that are more uncanny precise

93
00:04:12,170 --> 00:04:09,090
types of hits they're just weird but

94
00:04:13,910 --> 00:04:12,180
they're rather accurate and then into

95
00:04:15,590 --> 00:04:13,920
the next category of synchronicities

96
00:04:18,289 --> 00:04:15,600
which are weird uncanny things that

97
00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:18,299
actually cause physical events so this

98
00:04:22,640 --> 00:04:20,730
up here is just basically that's the

99
00:04:25,430 --> 00:04:22,650
timeline just to show you the start of a

100
00:04:27,280 --> 00:04:25,440
TSP session starts when you receive the

101
00:04:30,100 --> 00:04:27,290
clients target quest

102
00:04:32,260 --> 00:04:30,110
you do your advance reading you get your

103
00:04:33,970 --> 00:04:32,270
client feedback session then you may

104
00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:33,980
have several and once it's ended it's

105
00:04:38,890 --> 00:04:37,730
ended so to give you an example all

106
00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:38,900
right so you can understand this type of

107
00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:40,610
scoring this is an actual case that I

108
00:04:47,350 --> 00:04:44,930
worked on with a client the client gave

109
00:04:50,590 --> 00:04:47,360
me three target questions and basically

110
00:04:53,170 --> 00:04:50,600
involved he did an auto accident two

111
00:04:55,090 --> 00:04:53,180
years prior he'd the attorney had gotten

112
00:04:58,630 --> 00:04:55,100
the settlement proceeds was refusing to

113
00:05:00,520 --> 00:04:58,640
turn them over and was refusing to talk

114
00:05:03,820 --> 00:05:00,530
to the client or pick up the phone for

115
00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:03,830
two years so the client wanted to know

116
00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:05,090
what did I see

117
00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:07,010
regarding his attorney and what could he

118
00:05:11,380 --> 00:05:08,810
do to stop ruminating over a situation

119
00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:11,390
and I don't recall there being any other

120
00:05:17,470 --> 00:05:13,610
data on this particular case anyway so

121
00:05:19,780 --> 00:05:17,480
what I would call a an ordinary type of

122
00:05:22,090 --> 00:05:19,790
they hit okay that the attorney reneged

123
00:05:24,310 --> 00:05:22,100
on his initial fee agreement that a

124
00:05:26,110 --> 00:05:24,320
truck was involved in the accident that

125
00:05:28,210 --> 00:05:26,120
the client had suffered a concussion now

126
00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:28,220
all this was pre-written before I speak

127
00:05:32,740 --> 00:05:29,890
with the client it's all documented

128
00:05:34,990 --> 00:05:32,750
everything is meticulously documented by

129
00:05:37,720 --> 00:05:35,000
the way and I've got ten year you know

130
00:05:41,350 --> 00:05:37,730
more than 400 documented cases of these

131
00:05:43,420 --> 00:05:41,360
things so those are ordinary hits a

132
00:05:45,070 --> 00:05:43,430
little bit more uncanny that goes into

133
00:05:47,290 --> 00:05:45,080
the realm of I said the attorney has a

134
00:05:49,450 --> 00:05:47,300
whimsical quote item on his desk an

135
00:05:51,580 --> 00:05:49,460
artifact that is like a toy unquote that

136
00:05:53,380 --> 00:05:51,590
turned out to be accurate I said the

137
00:05:54,790 --> 00:05:53,390
attorney has dark brown hair and sick

138
00:05:58,930 --> 00:05:54,800
eyebrows that turned out to be accurate

139
00:06:00,700 --> 00:05:58,940
that's more like you're seeing something

140
00:06:02,410 --> 00:06:00,710
you're there it's a little peculiar that

141
00:06:04,150 --> 00:06:02,420
you're getting that much precision

142
00:06:06,490 --> 00:06:04,160
finally and this is one of the best

143
00:06:09,700 --> 00:06:06,500
synchronicities that I've had involved

144
00:06:11,620 --> 00:06:09,710
in one of the TSP cases I'm on the phone

145
00:06:16,240 --> 00:06:11,630
with the client during the client

146
00:06:17,830 --> 00:06:16,250
feedback session and the we're talking

147
00:06:20,410 --> 00:06:17,840
and all the sudden woman picks up the

148
00:06:22,480 --> 00:06:20,420
phone she says hello and the client says

149
00:06:24,730 --> 00:06:22,490
hello who is this and I'm thinking

150
00:06:25,810 --> 00:06:24,740
there's there must be a woman in the

151
00:06:27,430 --> 00:06:25,820
house she's picked up the other line

152
00:06:29,590 --> 00:06:27,440
turns out there was no women in the

153
00:06:31,660 --> 00:06:29,600
house he's alone he only has one phone

154
00:06:32,620 --> 00:06:31,670
line he does not know how to conference

155
00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:32,630
call and doesn't have that ability

156
00:06:38,290 --> 00:06:35,810
anyway and there's absolutely no reason

157
00:06:40,900 --> 00:06:38,300
for this to this person to be on this

158
00:06:42,970 --> 00:06:40,910
telephone call

159
00:06:45,130 --> 00:06:42,980
and so she says he says well who's this

160
00:06:47,500 --> 00:06:45,140
she said no who's this you called me and

161
00:06:48,910 --> 00:06:47,510
he said I did not I'm on the phone with

162
00:06:51,760 --> 00:06:48,920
somebody else right now how'd you get on

163
00:06:53,830 --> 00:06:51,770
my telephone call well I don't know and

164
00:06:56,530 --> 00:06:53,840
they got a little irritated it turns out

165
00:06:57,490 --> 00:06:56,540
that was the paralegal for the

166
00:07:00,280 --> 00:06:57,500
attorney's office

167
00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:00,290
she thought he had called her he had not

168
00:07:02,880 --> 00:07:01,490
because he'd been on phone with me the

169
00:07:06,250 --> 00:07:02,890
whole time he hadn't touched the phone

170
00:07:08,890 --> 00:07:06,260
so that was the lot and the next day he

171
00:07:10,660 --> 00:07:08,900
gets a call from the attorney's office

172
00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:10,670
manager saying that she's just put the

173
00:07:13,870 --> 00:07:11,810
check in the mail for the entire

174
00:07:19,390 --> 00:07:13,880
settlement proceeds that's a good

175
00:07:22,750 --> 00:07:19,400
synchronicity so okay so the problem is

176
00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:22,760
when you are trying to recognize the

177
00:07:26,170 --> 00:07:24,650
synchronicity how do you recognize it in

178
00:07:28,390 --> 00:07:26,180
order to put it into a scoring system

179
00:07:29,860 --> 00:07:28,400
and and that I thought was going to be

180
00:07:31,270 --> 00:07:29,870
an easy thing turns out it's really not

181
00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:31,280
so you have to go back to the basics

182
00:07:36,940 --> 00:07:33,770
which is to go back to young who I mean

183
00:07:39,130 --> 00:07:36,950
young pointed the term and he spent a

184
00:07:41,110 --> 00:07:39,140
good fifty years of his professional

185
00:07:43,630 --> 00:07:41,120
career really wrestling with this

186
00:07:45,190 --> 00:07:43,640
concept of what is a synchronicity which

187
00:07:47,470 --> 00:07:45,200
I now understand why he was wrestling

188
00:07:51,430 --> 00:07:47,480
with it he came up with a bunch of

189
00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:51,440
different definitions the most common

190
00:07:54,910 --> 00:07:53,210
one is the meaningful coincidence most

191
00:07:57,040 --> 00:07:54,920
of us heard that I thought you know

192
00:08:00,130 --> 00:07:57,050
that's easy it no it's not

193
00:08:03,250 --> 00:08:00,140
he came a causal parallelism well that

194
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:03,260
sort of knot should be easy no not

195
00:08:09,430 --> 00:08:06,890
really what I learned is that he

196
00:08:12,040 --> 00:08:09,440
actually was very inspired by a lot of

197
00:08:14,710 --> 00:08:12,050
JB Ryan's predictive work and the

198
00:08:15,850 --> 00:08:14,720
eaching and all that but but what

199
00:08:18,490 --> 00:08:15,860
inspired him in terms of the

200
00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:18,500
synchronicities was this relationship

201
00:08:25,450 --> 00:08:20,410
between the mind and a future event

202
00:08:27,130 --> 00:08:25,460
always going forward so I think you can

203
00:08:29,860 --> 00:08:27,140
break down you know different types of

204
00:08:32,980 --> 00:08:29,870
causality here three different ways you

205
00:08:34,810 --> 00:08:32,990
have your normal causality in for a

206
00:08:37,779 --> 00:08:34,820
synchronicity involving two events that

207
00:08:39,310 --> 00:08:37,789
are linked together or as Jung would

208
00:08:42,940 --> 00:08:39,320
have said there's a falling together in

209
00:08:45,340 --> 00:08:42,950
time of two events caused by an

210
00:08:47,950 --> 00:08:45,350
objective known force our field and he

211
00:08:49,950 --> 00:08:47,960
was desperate to find a force or field

212
00:08:53,560 --> 00:08:49,960
he couldn't with any of the known forces

213
00:08:54,230 --> 00:08:53,570
so the other option is there totally

214
00:08:57,019 --> 00:08:54,240
random event

215
00:08:58,910 --> 00:08:57,029
to events they have no objective links

216
00:09:01,820 --> 00:08:58,920
no force afield and they're no

217
00:09:03,560 --> 00:09:01,830
subjective links finally you have what

218
00:09:07,010 --> 00:09:03,570
young and would sort of his hybrid

219
00:09:08,720 --> 00:09:07,020
causality I guess of a causality so you

220
00:09:10,310 --> 00:09:08,730
have two events they have no objective

221
00:09:12,079 --> 00:09:10,320
linked they seem to be having this

222
00:09:14,900 --> 00:09:12,089
falling together in time that you can't

223
00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:14,910
explain but Young said well they're

224
00:09:19,490 --> 00:09:16,290
they're linked it's a synchronicity

225
00:09:20,570 --> 00:09:19,500
because they're meaningful well for me

226
00:09:24,740 --> 00:09:20,580
that's where there's all kinds of

227
00:09:26,870 --> 00:09:24,750
problems because they're meaningful to

228
00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:26,880
who I mean you know the famous story

229
00:09:30,949 --> 00:09:29,010
about the the the client who had the

230
00:09:32,810 --> 00:09:30,959
dream about the scarab beetle and he

231
00:09:35,150 --> 00:09:32,820
goes the window and there's a scarab

232
00:09:37,040 --> 00:09:35,160
eyed beetle or something that flies in

233
00:09:39,380 --> 00:09:37,050
well that was meaningful to young

234
00:09:41,090 --> 00:09:39,390
was it meaningful to the client we don't

235
00:09:43,280 --> 00:09:41,100
know and is that a synchronicity who's

236
00:09:44,780 --> 00:09:43,290
they have to be meaningful to also if

237
00:09:48,230 --> 00:09:44,790
you're looking he doesn't give a

238
00:09:52,550 --> 00:09:48,240
timeframe falling together when for how

239
00:09:54,110 --> 00:09:52,560
long - so a lot of you know about the

240
00:09:56,150 --> 00:09:54,120
like the interesting links between

241
00:09:57,260 --> 00:09:56,160
President Ford President Lincoln I mean

242
00:09:59,630 --> 00:09:57,270
they're all kinds of fascinating

243
00:10:01,970 --> 00:09:59,640
parallels but are those true

244
00:10:05,660 --> 00:10:01,980
synchronicities they happens a long time

245
00:10:08,210 --> 00:10:05,670
ago plus you can retrofit in order to

246
00:10:10,460 --> 00:10:08,220
you can cherry-pick well that that event

247
00:10:11,930 --> 00:10:10,470
sort of fits with this one because now I

248
00:10:13,579 --> 00:10:11,940
know what they both are and now I think

249
00:10:16,790 --> 00:10:13,589
they're both meaningful so I have a big

250
00:10:19,100 --> 00:10:16,800
problem with that so what I did is I

251
00:10:20,990 --> 00:10:19,110
created sort of a mini subset of the

252
00:10:22,790 --> 00:10:21,000
synchronicity that I call a TSP

253
00:10:25,810 --> 00:10:22,800
synchronicity and I created it so that

254
00:10:28,010 --> 00:10:25,820
at least has a couple of objective

255
00:10:31,569 --> 00:10:28,020
things that you can look at so you can

256
00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:31,579
analyze it within the context of a TSP

257
00:10:36,019 --> 00:10:35,010
session and so if you look at it sort of

258
00:10:38,420 --> 00:10:36,029
like it's you're looking at a

259
00:10:41,930 --> 00:10:38,430
synchronicity under a microscope or in a

260
00:10:43,970 --> 00:10:41,940
petri dish three requirements one you

261
00:10:46,579 --> 00:10:43,980
need two events second they have to

262
00:10:49,220 --> 00:10:46,589
occur during this TSP time period from

263
00:10:52,670 --> 00:10:49,230
the time when the client first sends

264
00:10:55,819 --> 00:10:52,680
their target information to the time of

265
00:10:58,519 --> 00:10:55,829
the last session and three the

266
00:11:03,110 --> 00:10:58,529
synchronicity can be identified by the

267
00:11:04,760 --> 00:11:03,120
client the viewer or both of those two

268
00:11:07,170 --> 00:11:04,770
events and this is sort of critical to

269
00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:07,180
understand this one of them

270
00:11:13,230 --> 00:11:09,970
is always going to be the viewers

271
00:11:16,710 --> 00:11:13,240
advance reading which means it's always

272
00:11:20,210 --> 00:11:16,720
going to be documented it's time-stamped

273
00:11:23,820 --> 00:11:20,220
as an actual event not a retroactive

274
00:11:25,860 --> 00:11:23,830
retrofitting of meaning okay so that's

275
00:11:27,990 --> 00:11:25,870
very important and I use that to sort of

276
00:11:31,650 --> 00:11:28,000
document present time as you'll see

277
00:11:32,970 --> 00:11:31,660
within the context of a TSP session the

278
00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:32,980
other thing that the advance reading

279
00:11:37,770 --> 00:11:36,370
does is it sets the theme for whatever

280
00:11:40,560 --> 00:11:37,780
synchronicities are going to be

281
00:11:42,180 --> 00:11:40,570
occurring in the TSP time period so now

282
00:11:43,950 --> 00:11:42,190
you're not dealing with again

283
00:11:46,500 --> 00:11:43,960
retrofitting somebody's meaningfulness

284
00:11:48,930 --> 00:11:46,510
you have a theme and it's been written

285
00:11:51,840 --> 00:11:48,940
down in advance before you ever know

286
00:11:55,200 --> 00:11:51,850
about the synchronicities that are going

287
00:11:57,450 --> 00:11:55,210
to be within that session so I'll give

288
00:11:59,040 --> 00:11:57,460
you some examples now what's interesting

289
00:12:02,070 --> 00:11:59,050
is and I'm going to show you this in a

290
00:12:04,680 --> 00:12:02,080
bit these synchronicities occur before

291
00:12:06,570 --> 00:12:04,690
during and after the advance reading in

292
00:12:09,450 --> 00:12:06,580
advance reading I'm considering present

293
00:12:12,660 --> 00:12:09,460
time so to give you an example of

294
00:12:14,820 --> 00:12:12,670
synchronicity occurs before the advance

295
00:12:16,650 --> 00:12:14,830
reading I had told a client who she had

296
00:12:17,850 --> 00:12:16,660
a question about whether she'd get a job

297
00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:17,860
or something like that and I said well I

298
00:12:23,850 --> 00:12:21,010
see that you or I wrote this down you're

299
00:12:26,280 --> 00:12:23,860
this I see a job that's in the north

300
00:12:28,080 --> 00:12:26,290
it's Northwest section of the city the

301
00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:28,090
urban center that you're in it's 20

302
00:12:33,210 --> 00:12:30,970
minutes away so we have our client

303
00:12:36,510 --> 00:12:33,220
session I learned from her that just

304
00:12:38,820 --> 00:12:36,520
prior to my advance reading time she

305
00:12:42,210 --> 00:12:38,830
that she'd gotten a job offer northwest

306
00:12:43,860 --> 00:12:42,220
of her city 20 minutes away an example

307
00:12:45,840 --> 00:12:43,870
of something that occurs during or

308
00:12:47,900 --> 00:12:45,850
concurrent with the writing the advance

309
00:12:50,310 --> 00:12:47,910
reading I'll give you another example

310
00:12:53,190 --> 00:12:50,320
this was a client he only wanted to know

311
00:12:55,710 --> 00:12:53,200
about Business and Finance okay so I did

312
00:13:00,030 --> 00:12:55,720
all that and at the very end I had drawn

313
00:13:02,070 --> 00:13:00,040
a sketch of railroad bridge with arches

314
00:13:05,460 --> 00:13:02,080
and tracks and there's a railroad going

315
00:13:07,560 --> 00:13:05,470
but train going over the top of it and I

316
00:13:09,780 --> 00:13:07,570
said look I'm really sorry I don't think

317
00:13:11,760 --> 00:13:09,790
this relates to business or finances I

318
00:13:13,440 --> 00:13:11,770
mean does this mean anything at all do

319
00:13:15,210 --> 00:13:13,450
you have any and he smiles and he

320
00:13:17,970 --> 00:13:15,220
reaches over in his desk because we're

321
00:13:20,879 --> 00:13:17,980
skyping and he pulls up a the same

322
00:13:22,829 --> 00:13:20,889
picture and he says yeah I

323
00:13:24,869 --> 00:13:22,839
just remote viewing for this other group

324
00:13:27,569 --> 00:13:24,879
that I do and this is what I just drew

325
00:13:30,900 --> 00:13:27,579
this is it and it was exactly the same

326
00:13:33,269 --> 00:13:30,910
thing give you an example of a

327
00:13:36,509 --> 00:13:33,279
synchronicity that occurs after the

328
00:13:38,669 --> 00:13:36,519
advance reading so in this case I had a

329
00:13:40,829 --> 00:13:38,679
client she wanted to know what had

330
00:13:44,879 --> 00:13:40,839
happened she it was a suspicious death

331
00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:44,889
of a relative of hers who was a pilot so

332
00:13:52,199 --> 00:13:48,730
I said listen all I get is a it's like a

333
00:13:56,819 --> 00:13:52,209
chili pepper and I'm interpreting that

334
00:14:00,359 --> 00:13:56,829
as it's somehow related to a Central

335
00:14:01,579 --> 00:14:00,369
American country does I said does that

336
00:14:04,079 --> 00:14:01,589
mean anything all to you

337
00:14:06,210 --> 00:14:04,089
she said well could it be Nicaragua I

338
00:14:09,509 --> 00:14:06,220
said yeah sure that's in Central America

339
00:14:13,409 --> 00:14:09,519
we finish within a couple hours on my

340
00:14:16,590 --> 00:14:13,419
LinkedIn I get a LinkedIn friend request

341
00:14:18,599 --> 00:14:16,600
from somebody who says they are a CIA

342
00:14:25,919 --> 00:14:18,609
operative and an advisor to the

343
00:14:27,900 --> 00:14:25,929
president of Nicaragua okay so a

344
00:14:29,549 --> 00:14:27,910
causality so you've sort of two

345
00:14:30,960 --> 00:14:29,559
different types now youngs which is

346
00:14:33,720 --> 00:14:30,970
linked by subjective feeling of

347
00:14:34,710 --> 00:14:33,730
meaningfulness mine which is tspa

348
00:14:37,379 --> 00:14:34,720
causality

349
00:14:39,509 --> 00:14:37,389
linked with some objective components

350
00:14:41,819 --> 00:14:39,519
now you have a limited time period so

351
00:14:45,329 --> 00:14:41,829
you can really examine it and you've got

352
00:14:51,379 --> 00:14:45,339
a predetermined theme so I'm gonna give

353
00:14:55,139 --> 00:14:51,389
you the example group of synchronicities

354
00:15:00,389 --> 00:14:55,149
all right so this is from 1917 to the

355
00:15:03,720 --> 00:15:00,399
beginning of 2000 no whoa 2017 to the

356
00:15:06,569 --> 00:15:03,730
beginning of 2019 70 cases all right I

357
00:15:08,669 --> 00:15:06,579
was a viewer in all 70 cases 64 percent

358
00:15:11,729 --> 00:15:08,679
female 36 percent male virtually all of

359
00:15:13,379 --> 00:15:11,739
them American wide range of professions

360
00:15:15,479 --> 00:15:13,389
I think I'm astrologer or lawyer real

361
00:15:18,090 --> 00:15:15,489
estate government and TV producer so on

362
00:15:19,979 --> 00:15:18,100
the client target questions tend to

363
00:15:23,369 --> 00:15:19,989
relate or tend to be five main

364
00:15:25,199 --> 00:15:23,379
categories first is psychic or practical

365
00:15:28,769 --> 00:15:25,209
type of advice that they're seeking or

366
00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:28,779
medical intuitive mediumship ufology or

367
00:15:37,350 --> 00:15:34,130
paranormal questions of those 78

368
00:15:40,809 --> 00:15:37,360
of them had synchronicities that's 26%

369
00:15:43,090 --> 00:15:40,819
that's a lot so now we have a way to

370
00:15:45,550 --> 00:15:43,100
gauge the the relationship between the

371
00:15:48,100 --> 00:15:45,560
two okay and gender is roughly goes down

372
00:15:50,499 --> 00:15:48,110
to about the same there were actually 27

373
00:15:53,559 --> 00:15:50,509
synchronicities because some of the

374
00:15:55,720 --> 00:15:53,569
clients experienced more than one the

375
00:15:59,050 --> 00:15:55,730
highest number was 3 nobody got 4 and

376
00:16:00,790 --> 00:15:59,060
the average TSP time period in which to

377
00:16:05,470 --> 00:16:00,800
judge whether they were going to be any

378
00:16:08,559 --> 00:16:05,480
synchronicities was 26 days so what is

379
00:16:10,930 --> 00:16:08,569
that tsp sample group reveal about TSP

380
00:16:13,949 --> 00:16:10,940
synchronicities I made graphs for you

381
00:16:16,930 --> 00:16:13,959
guys because after you guys like graphs

382
00:16:19,329 --> 00:16:16,940
so I have the horizontal lines all the

383
00:16:20,769 --> 00:16:19,339
18 clients each bar represents a

384
00:16:22,809 --> 00:16:20,779
synchronicity some of them have more

385
00:16:26,889 --> 00:16:22,819
than one that's more than one

386
00:16:28,689 --> 00:16:26,899
synchronicity and the if you well you

387
00:16:30,340 --> 00:16:28,699
could see past president the president

388
00:16:31,960 --> 00:16:30,350
is marked by the number two and you go

389
00:16:33,939 --> 00:16:31,970
up to the top vertically and that's

390
00:16:35,620 --> 00:16:33,949
where the session ends total

391
00:16:37,990 --> 00:16:35,630
twenty-seven synchronicities twelve of

392
00:16:41,019 --> 00:16:38,000
them in the future nine in the past six

393
00:16:42,490 --> 00:16:41,029
concurrent or present now this diagram I

394
00:16:44,769 --> 00:16:42,500
happen to love nobody else likes this

395
00:16:47,530 --> 00:16:44,779
but I think it's a dual causality

396
00:16:49,710 --> 00:16:47,540
diagram the two ways to look at it okay

397
00:16:52,300 --> 00:16:49,720
one of them would be your typical

398
00:16:54,220 --> 00:16:52,310
concept of linear time going from past

399
00:16:56,019 --> 00:16:54,230
present future those yellow dots

400
00:16:58,269 --> 00:16:56,029
represent the present time of the

401
00:17:01,660 --> 00:16:58,279
advance reading the blue dots represent

402
00:17:03,160 --> 00:17:01,670
the other synchronistic event so you can

403
00:17:07,630 --> 00:17:03,170
sort of see how they're falling all over

404
00:17:09,130 --> 00:17:07,640
the place and it creates a problem if

405
00:17:13,240 --> 00:17:09,140
you're looking for a force or a field

406
00:17:17,980 --> 00:17:13,250
that's going to be for example well oh

407
00:17:20,020 --> 00:17:17,990
no no no I'm not gonna play with it

408
00:17:21,970 --> 00:17:20,030
one of the blue dots in the past does

409
00:17:25,390 --> 00:17:21,980
that cause the advance reading or does

410
00:17:26,559 --> 00:17:25,400
the advance reading cause it and so you

411
00:17:28,120 --> 00:17:26,569
start if you're looking at linear

412
00:17:30,190 --> 00:17:28,130
sequential time you clearly have a

413
00:17:31,690 --> 00:17:30,200
problem with that if you look at this

414
00:17:34,270 --> 00:17:31,700
like it's an orange and you're looking

415
00:17:35,860 --> 00:17:34,280
down on top of it as if you're looking a

416
00:17:38,020 --> 00:17:35,870
great time okay

417
00:17:41,140 --> 00:17:38,030
concurrent time all time exists together

418
00:17:43,180 --> 00:17:41,150
and all you got to do is access it then

419
00:17:44,860 --> 00:17:43,190
what you you have a different

420
00:17:46,720 --> 00:17:44,870
perspective now you're looking at events

421
00:17:47,310 --> 00:17:46,730
that are not causally related they are

422
00:17:51,659 --> 00:17:47,320
related

423
00:17:53,940 --> 00:17:51,669
you may have set something up you don't

424
00:17:55,470 --> 00:17:53,950
know particularly which thing has been

425
00:17:57,350 --> 00:17:55,480
the weather it's been the intentional

426
00:18:00,870 --> 00:17:57,360
focus or what it's been

427
00:18:04,350 --> 00:18:00,880
summary high number of synchronicities

428
00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:04,360
and TSP or remote-viewing 26% 2 TSP

429
00:18:07,980 --> 00:18:06,610
synchronistic events occur before during

430
00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:07,990
and after the advance reading

431
00:18:11,909 --> 00:18:10,450
predictions are already written and of

432
00:18:13,919 --> 00:18:11,919
course I don't know about the

433
00:18:17,039 --> 00:18:13,929
synchronicities until much later

434
00:18:18,899 --> 00:18:17,049
and finally TSP remote viewing accuracy

435
00:18:21,779 --> 00:18:18,909
is supported by actual synchronistic

436
00:18:24,619 --> 00:18:21,789
events without relying on a subjective

437
00:18:29,279 --> 00:18:24,629
sense of meaningfulness or a limitless

438
00:18:30,360 --> 00:18:29,289
timeframe so thanks very much and I may

439
00:18:32,129 --> 00:18:30,370
raise something that's up if any are you

440
00:18:35,100 --> 00:18:32,139
interested my website is the skeptical

441
00:18:37,919 --> 00:18:35,110
psychic comm I have some books for sale

442
00:18:47,150 --> 00:18:37,929
out there and I think that was it so

443
00:18:55,260 --> 00:18:49,500
okay we do have a few minutes for

444
00:18:58,260 --> 00:18:55,270
questions when you remote view the

445
00:19:00,930 --> 00:18:58,270
future are you imagining that there that

446
00:19:02,850 --> 00:19:00,940
the future is a fixed determined target

447
00:19:04,350 --> 00:19:02,860
or more like what I would be inclined to

448
00:19:07,710 --> 00:19:04,360
think that your remote viewing various

449
00:19:09,120 --> 00:19:07,720
future possibilities but that any agents

450
00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:09,130
present in the scenario that have a

451
00:19:14,070 --> 00:19:11,410
degree of free will would be wildcard

452
00:19:16,380 --> 00:19:14,080
variables that might collapse one future

453
00:19:18,090 --> 00:19:16,390
possibility into actuality while keeping

454
00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:18,100
others on manna-fest so therefore it'd

455
00:19:22,440 --> 00:19:19,930
be sort of intrinsically unreliable

456
00:19:24,570 --> 00:19:22,450
based on that I'm wondering which of

457
00:19:26,130 --> 00:19:24,580
those models or if or some other one

458
00:19:29,670 --> 00:19:26,140
that you view when you're doing

459
00:19:31,290 --> 00:19:29,680
clairvoyant yeah well I'm not sure that

460
00:19:34,020 --> 00:19:31,300
I'm particularly looking at a future

461
00:19:37,740 --> 00:19:34,030
unless I'm being asked to do that in

462
00:19:40,020 --> 00:19:37,750
which case I'm just going there but I'm

463
00:19:41,790 --> 00:19:40,030
not I'm not purposely moving myself

464
00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:41,800
forwards or backwards or being worried

465
00:19:46,890 --> 00:19:44,170
about you know what are gonna be any

466
00:19:48,870 --> 00:19:46,900
intervening events and particularly for

467
00:19:51,990 --> 00:19:48,880
these synchronicities I'm not going to a

468
00:19:54,810 --> 00:19:52,000
future I'm simply not going there it the

469
00:20:00,770 --> 00:19:54,820
future is just happening along with it

470
00:20:12,420 --> 00:20:06,600
but just a comment really just a comment

471
00:20:16,760 --> 00:20:12,430
really interesting talk I suggest you

472
00:20:20,760 --> 00:20:16,770
take a look at to go to academia.edu

473
00:20:23,430 --> 00:20:20,770
search on my name and archaeology papers

474
00:20:25,590 --> 00:20:23,440
particularly and look at the Mobius

475
00:20:28,650 --> 00:20:25,600
consensus protocol because you may find

476
00:20:32,760 --> 00:20:28,660
some things that you find useful and

477
00:20:34,290 --> 00:20:32,770
what you're doing cool like what do you

478
00:20:35,730 --> 00:20:34,300
want me to talk about that it just one

479
00:20:39,360 --> 00:20:35,740
or two if you had a particular thought

480
00:20:42,180 --> 00:20:39,370
about something that might be there is a

481
00:20:43,890 --> 00:20:42,190
a much more detail I don't want to be

482
00:20:46,650 --> 00:20:43,900
critical there's a much more detailed

483
00:20:54,220 --> 00:20:46,660
way of evaluating the accuracy of what

484
00:20:58,430 --> 00:20:56,630
so I'm interested actually in some

485
00:21:00,740 --> 00:20:58,440
reader locution where you using a word

486
00:21:02,630 --> 00:21:00,750
reading a lot and of course that's

487
00:21:04,730 --> 00:21:02,640
fairly non-standard uses you remote you

488
00:21:06,730 --> 00:21:04,740
know we don't talk about reading so much

489
00:21:11,120 --> 00:21:06,740
as we talk about perceptions impressions

490
00:21:12,950 --> 00:21:11,130
experiencing that's kind of a thing and

491
00:21:14,570 --> 00:21:12,960
it strikes me I don't know maybe is this

492
00:21:16,850 --> 00:21:14,580
more of a hybrid between remote viewing

493
00:21:19,760 --> 00:21:16,860
and your your kind of standard psychic

494
00:21:22,310 --> 00:21:19,770
practice that the people who are psyche

495
00:21:23,660 --> 00:21:22,320
but aren't remote viewers engage in it

496
00:21:25,070 --> 00:21:23,670
seems to be a little bit of what's going

497
00:21:26,930 --> 00:21:25,080
on here and is that maybe why you're

498
00:21:30,560 --> 00:21:26,940
using it term reading so much

499
00:21:32,480 --> 00:21:30,570
I used that's from whence I come I mean

500
00:21:35,510 --> 00:21:32,490
I was the present for ten years as a

501
00:21:37,820 --> 00:21:35,520
psychic detective and I do all types of

502
00:21:39,950 --> 00:21:37,830
what you would call psychic readings I'm

503
00:21:41,450 --> 00:21:39,960
but I'm also trained in in controlled

504
00:21:43,430 --> 00:21:41,460
reviewing associated remote viewing

505
00:21:47,270 --> 00:21:43,440
extended remote viewing I know all of

506
00:21:49,460 --> 00:21:47,280
that stuff too but this is a form of a

507
00:21:52,460 --> 00:21:49,470
hybrid and I did it on purpose because I

508
00:21:55,190 --> 00:21:52,470
was not getting what I needed in terms

509
00:21:57,260 --> 00:21:55,200
of both data and set and client

510
00:21:58,490 --> 00:21:57,270
satisfaction I don't have the luxury of

511
00:22:00,890 --> 00:21:58,500
the benefit of having seventeen

512
00:22:03,170 --> 00:22:00,900
intelligence agencies as my clients or

513
00:22:05,360 --> 00:22:03,180
whatever I just don't have it I'm

514
00:22:08,510 --> 00:22:05,370
dealing with individuals who if you tell

515
00:22:12,050 --> 00:22:08,520
them that something is you know red and

516
00:22:14,150 --> 00:22:12,060
kind of mushy or soft and and you know

517
00:22:17,210 --> 00:22:14,160
it speaks whatever they're gonna say huh

518
00:22:18,650 --> 00:22:17,220
I need something I need something so

519
00:22:20,030 --> 00:22:18,660
what you're saying is your approach is

520
00:22:22,220 --> 00:22:20,040
more stream-of-consciousness than

521
00:22:24,860 --> 00:22:22,230
standard remote viewing is that were

522
00:22:28,550 --> 00:22:24,870
you're suggesting no I I think I don't

523
00:22:31,220 --> 00:22:28,560
see a difference well how you just

524
00:22:32,750 --> 00:22:31,230
describe remote viewing of course is you

525
00:22:34,190 --> 00:22:32,760
know low-level remote viewing where

526
00:22:37,100 --> 00:22:34,200
you're talking about direct sensory

527
00:22:38,210 --> 00:22:37,110
types of impressions right but were you

528
00:22:42,440 --> 00:22:38,220
talking about here is actually more

529
00:22:44,660 --> 00:22:42,450
contextual you have a lot of verbal

530
00:22:46,340 --> 00:22:44,670
description that that remote approach is

531
00:22:48,050 --> 00:22:46,350
that from a different way so that's

532
00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:48,060
probably the hybrid element here that

533
00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:50,010
you're talking about I am extremely and

534
00:22:53,360 --> 00:22:51,570
you know I didn't have time to explain

535
00:22:54,350 --> 00:22:53,370
all the different protocols that I have

536
00:22:58,880 --> 00:22:54,360
developed but they're all very

537
00:23:00,590 --> 00:22:58,890
integrated with each other and yes I

538
00:23:01,730 --> 00:23:00,600
think it's I think there for example I

539
00:23:03,470 --> 00:23:01,740
don't think you have to you can go in

540
00:23:06,500 --> 00:23:03,480
partially front-loaded because that you

541
00:23:07,049 --> 00:23:06,510
can you know get by the various problems

542
00:23:10,230 --> 00:23:07,059
of

543
00:23:12,560 --> 00:23:10,240
stuff

544
00:23:16,529 --> 00:23:12,570
and I think that you can put together

545
00:23:20,820 --> 00:23:16,539
complex concepts for people as opposed

546
00:23:24,320 --> 00:23:20,830
to breaking them all apart I'm sorry but

547
00:23:27,930 --> 00:23:24,330
I think we need to cut this debate short